libera/#devuan/ Thursday, 2019-03-14

se7enI am having trouble with apt06:32
se7enapt is set up to use the deb url06:32
se7enWhich apparently is a pool06:32
se7enBut the only pool member it is connecting to is prod.debian.map.fastly.net06:32
se7enThis url seems down06:33
gnarfaceeven on multiple retries?06:33
se7enWait, it finally started06:34
se7enIt took a long time06:34
gnarfacei'm guessing you have a dual problem here; unlucky hit of a bunk mirror coinciding with high DNS load at your ISP06:35
gnarface(the second problem you can easily work around by just using a local DNS)06:35
se7enI am using OpenNIC though06:38
gnarfacewhat's that?06:39
se7enAnd it already resolved the IP06:39
gnarfaceoh, alternic06:39
gnarfaceuh, i wouldn't necessarily suggest that's a good idea in the first place, but i would assume that it's only a minor change to make any of the existing dns servers/cachers use opennic instead06:40
gnarfaceit would in either case eliminate nearly all delays in DNS resolution06:40
gnarfaceat least then that rules that out06:41
gnarface(keep in mind those DNS lookups aren't typically cached locally unless you make it so.  only firefox does that by default, and only until you restart it)06:49
g0zzyIs there any reason to prefer a standalone installer over the install-from-live option?14:17
KatolaZg0zzy: if you don't want to have exactly the same stuff that's in the live, then you need a "standalone" installer14:19
g0zzyWell i don't mind that. Do i get the normal partitioner though with from-live?14:21
g0zzyOr to put it another way, is it JUST the packages that differ? I normally use the netinst14:22
gnarfaceno partitioner in the live version.  it literally just clones itself14:22
g0zzyThanks for that. Question answered ;)14:23
gnarfacenp14:23
gnarfaceif you want to see how it does it, it's based on some part of refracta14:23
g0zzyAh thanks14:25
g0zzySlightly more recherché question: i got "No packages found that can be upgraded unattended" after installing unattended-upgrades. A manual upgrade found loads to do. I know that there have been upgrades since and i've had no mail notification14:31
gnarface i've never used that, so i'm not sure what it's hanging up on, but you need to have a mail server installed locally for the system to be able to send mail to itself14:33
gnarface(for personal use, i recommend exim4-daemon-light)14:34
gnarfacewhich packages count as installable "unattended" may be affected by your debconf priority setting14:36
gnarfacesomeone else in here a few days ago had been mentioning having problems getting unattended-upgrades up and running too, but i forget who it was.  i think they did get it worked out...14:37
g0zzyCould have been me ;) exim4 configged and working btw14:53
gnarfaceyou made sure to tell it to answer local-only, right?14:54
g0zzyDon't fully get you there14:54
g0zzyI installed it the same way as i do in Stretch and tested a mail to root. It came to my phone14:55
gnarfacedidn't it ask you any questions?14:56
gnarfacebefore install?14:56
gnarfaceor right after, actually?14:56
gnarfacewell, since you're mailing your phone with it, i'm just gonna assume it's doing what you ant14:57
gnarfacewhat you want*14:57
gnarfaceit can be configured to only send and receive mail locally14:58
gnarfacelike as in, within the computer itself14:58
g0zzyOh yes, i see. root is aliased to me email address14:59
g0zzys/me/my14:59
gnarfaceif you want to change the main settings at any time, just run this:  dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config14:59
gnarface(in general, "dpkg-reconfigure" will do the same thing for any package that asks debconf questions, but remember that debconf does have a priority threshold that can adjust how many questions it asks)15:00
gnarfacei think it normally by default aliases root to your main local user15:02
gnarfaceand then system mails won't leave the system15:02
gnarfacebut you know it depends on what you want to do15:02
g0zzyYes. Anyway the main problem is unattended. I wonder if it WAS me that was the person you had in mind. I suppose i could check the chat history?15:03
gnarfaceah, maybe it was you15:04
gnarfaceor else my scrollback just doesn't go back that far15:05
gnarfacedid you see this wiki page? https://wiki.debian.org/UnattendedUpgrades15:05
g0zzyYes. Funnily enough i had no problem with Stretch ;)15:06
gnarfaceinteresting.  that suggests a permissions issue15:06
gnarfacenothing else relevant should have changed15:07
gnarfacebut it might also just be that there's one or two packages you need to install first manually15:07
g0zzy I was root in a terminal when i tried the (wiki-suggested method of running unattented-upgrade manually15:07
gnarfaceyou did get the part about uncommenting this line, right?  Unattended-Upgrade::Mail "root";15:08
g0zzyShall check15:08
gnarfacedpkg-reconfigure -plow unattended-upgrades15:09
gnarface^ this might be worth trying too, if you haven't15:09
g0zzyOh gawd. Not 100% sure. Could have missed it. The box is currently about 15 miles away15:10
gnarface"-plow" is for low priority15:11
g0zzyYes.15:11
gnarfacewhich i think means it'll pretty much ask every possible question?15:11
gnarfacebut the default threshold is high, according to this wiki...15:12
g0zzyI could do with some kind of uPnP shh setup15:12
gnarfacewhich in some cases, might be too high to ask the questions you need to set up unattended15:12
* g0zzy finds that clients can easily undo remote access - changing router, resetting same etc.15:13
gnarfaceall i can say at this point is read over https://wiki.debian.org/UnattendedUpgrades again, and then if nothing on there answers the question, check the bug reports15:15
g0zzyThanks15:15
gnarfaceno problem, sorry i couldn't be more help.15:15
g0zzyAnyone know anything about uPnP facilities for sshd btw?15:15
gnarfacenot that will survive the customer replacing their router without notice15:16
gnarfaceyou could approach the problem differently though15:16
xinomilounattended-upgrades default configuration updates only *-security packages. maybe there were none?15:16
gnarfaceyou could set up a server of your own and make the client's box persistently connect to that instead, which *can* survive a router swap, if set up right15:17
g0zzy>>unattended-upgrades default configuration updates only *-security packages. maybe there were none? OOps - didn't notice that.15:18
g0zzyAs for your suggestion, sounds interesting, but how would i get a shell to _their_ box?15:19
gnarfacewell you'd have ssh tunnel out to your box, then you'd ssh to your box, and then from your box back through their tunnel15:21
gnarfacebut it would also be a very traditional use case for a VPN15:21
gnarfacebut it could be done entirely with some clever ssh tunneling and a cron job15:22
gnarfacemost default router configurations don't restrict outbound connections, so that would remove the need for port forwarding or uPnP15:25
g0zzyYes. Sounds interesting. I think maybe just set up a script on wicd trigger to set up the tunnel to me from my client's box perhaps?15:26
g0zzyIOW a permanent tunnel15:26
gnarfaceyea that probably would work too15:26
gnarfacei mentioned the cron job because i was thinking more along the lines of something that checks every few minutes if the tunnel is still up, then attempts to reconnect it if it is not15:27
gnarface(something a VPN would do automatically)15:27
g0zzyYes, i see15:27
gnarfacea wicd trigger could work too15:27
gnarfacei bet there's a dozen different subsystems you could use to trigger it in fact15:28
gnarfacebut only you can decide if this technical challenge is less trouble than the management challenge of just convincing the customers to leave the router settings alone15:28
g0zzyWell it would be wicd in Devuan that would know when the tunnel can be established15:28
gnarfacethat is true, but a cron job can as easily check that15:29
gnarfacei'm old-fashioned15:29
g0zzyTrouble is that they can always do something with their router. Some are domestic and actually buggy.15:29
* g0zzy is looking at BT 'fibre' hubs15:30
gnarfaceyes, and if they start getting paranoid and restricting outbound connections, there's nothing you can do to stop that type of sabotage15:30
gnarfaceat a certain point they have to have SOME clue about what they should not do15:30
golinuxgnarface: For future reference there are installation guides with screenshots starting here: https://devuan.org/os/documentation/install-guides/start-here.html15:37
golinuxg0zzy: ^^^15:38
golinuxNavigation is at the bottom.  g0zzy You can see the options for the -live installer there.15:38
g0zzyThanks for that15:40
gnarfacethanks golinux, i keep forgetting about that15:42
golinuxgnarface: But you remember so many other pointers!15:52
gnarfacei even remember stuff i don't want to remember.  it's strange the things i can't.15:52
golinuxg0zzy: You can also install the -live isos from the cli but we haven't gotten around to doing the screenshots yet.15:53
golinuxThat's my preferred method for the -live install.15:54
golinuxgnarface: The mind is illogical in what it grabs on to.15:55
g0zzyThanks folks for the help17:19
golinuxThis just posted on dev1galaxy.  Title is Burnt burnt burnt...  https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=272919:18
g0zzyPersonally i think that systemd is likely just going to need more and more patches to keep systems running. Breakages are likely19:38
sixwheeledbeastuPnP should be disabled IMO. VPN is the only secure solution i can think of that will suit. I would also never use an ISP provided router19:42
xinomilojust upgraded kernel and boot process is full of these : kernel: [   65.391209] PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key19:42
xinomilolinux-image-4.19.0-4-amd6419:43
xinomilofrom ceres19:43
g0zzysixwheeledbeast: I agree. afaics most ISP routers have UPnP by default19:52
DonkeyHoteirouters provided by at&t are not even capable of UPnP as an option19:53
DonkeyHoteiprogress?19:54
sixwheeledbeastYes and also they often leave ACS access open to the ISP too19:54
DonkeyHoteias well as ssh19:55
xinomilook, debian kernel bug, reported earlier today : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92457419:55
sixwheeledbeastg0zzy: DrayTek are BT SIN compliant if you are looking for something more commercial that's FTTC/FTTN compatible19:56
DonkeyHoteiBT HomeHub Type 5A can run OpenWrt19:58
g0zzyYes, i've noticed that the later models can do OpenWrt. Might be an option20:00
g0zzyUnfortunately i think Draytek are not movable to OpenWrt20:01
DonkeyHoteinot "later models"20:04
DonkeyHoteijust the 5A20:04
sixwheeledbeastDraytek is closed OS if you are looking for something more open then look on the openwrt forums for recommended models. Your most likely to get a Smarthub now which has Broadcom with no drivers20:04
sixwheeledbeastno open drviers anyway20:04
gnu_srs1golinux: More and more people are being aware :)20:41
sokanbuZz: I got it!! It's on my hands :322:19
sokanMan.. thinkpad T420 is beyond incredible... You can actually feel and understand how solid it is22:20
sokanquality all over22:20
buZzwoot!22:20
buZzcongratz22:20
sokangeneral test passed. time to install dev1 now :322:23
sokandev1 supports uefi right?22:27
sokanbuZz: can I pm you?22:28
buZzyes22:29
buZzdevuan does support uefi22:29
sokanbuZz: I should get the bios to have uefi priority right?22:31
buZzehw, whatever the default is should be fine22:31
buZzplug in installer usb, make it boot from that22:31
buZzdone ?22:31
sokangoing with dvd xD22:31
sokanclassic installer is so neat22:33
buZzoh right, t420 is big enough to host a cd drive :P22:37
sokanhaha22:47
sokanyes sir!22:47
sokanthis is probably too noob a question but I want to just make 100% sure. The warning I have about another system being on BIOS (pobably defauly w7 installation) and devuan installer being on UEFI should be ignored if I plan on going pure devuan right?22:48
sokandoes popcon help devuan at all?23:18

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!