libera/#devuan/ Tuesday, 2019-09-17

_abc_Hello. Where is man ImageMagick(1) ? Not found even after apt get install imagemagick-doc13:41
_abc_I am really REALLY fed up with debian project splitting binaries from docs. No other distro I used before did this.13:42
_abc_docs should be a "recommended" package when installing the package itself.13:42
_abc_Not only is the ImageMagick manual missing but all dependent programs such as convert do not mention their siblings in section SEE ALSO, they mention ImageMagick itself, which is not to be found. Made of fail, seriously.13:44
_abc_This is the missing manpage. I realize this is an upstream problem but it's still relevant, in the sense that little omissions like this could be fixed in the devuan project. I think.13:46
_abc_https://linux.die.net/man/1/imagemagick this13:46
devuanHello, i have problem with xfce4-terminal.It simply does not dispaly the output of w,who and users command.Any idea what is wrong?thanks14:04
rrqimagemagick-6-doc14:31
_abc_rrq: not present14:46
_abc_wait, /usr/share/doc/imagemagick-6-doc ??14:47
_abc_what the hell14:47
_abc_The manpage is definitely not in the packages.14:47
rrqyes; not a man page, but html documentation.14:47
_abc_The html docs are completely useless. Fragmented, no proper index tree, and not searchable. I used grep on the plain text tree14:58
_abc_The real manpages for things like convert(1) all mention man ImageMagick(1). Who removed it from debian? It is present in Arch and other distros.14:58
yetiman Image::Magick # ? is in buster15:00
_abc_Possible15:01
_abc_That is Perl?15:01
_abc_Image::Magick is a pm which interfaces with ImageMagick core15:01
yetiI've no idea who installed this and what it is.... perl is a good suspect...15:01
_abc_Unrelated to what I asked15:01
_abc_After grep -Rli on the /usr/share/doc/imagemagick* I see several fails. There are 3 copies of the documentation installed, in 3 directories, the full api docs are installed, the ImageMagic(1) manpage is not, and there is no index.15:02
_abc_What the hell. Who releases these insane packages?!15:02
_abc_Clearly nobody checked the packages after making them.15:02
_abc_ImageMagick is a perfect example of program which is useless without docs, there are over 40 options for each program, the manpages are close to unreadable.15:03
onefangI'm still wondering why JPEG 2000 support was removed from everything in Debian except ImageMagick.  Very annoying, I use them a lot.15:03
yeti  Installed: 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.115:03
yetihere... no man pages so far15:03
_abc_yeti: you can see man convert and man display.15:04
_abc_On windows the programs are called imconvert and imdisplay. WHY name them something else in linux?15:04
yetiyields convert-im6.q16(1)15:04
yetimanpage for...15:05
yetiman display --> display-im6.q16(1)15:05
_abc_should be right15:06
yetiyip... there are +/- 16 man pages for related stuff15:06
yeti$ dpkg --listfiles imagemagick-6.q16 | grep /man/man | wc -l15:07
yeti1315:07
yetiok... 1315:07
_abc_dpkg --listfiles imagemagick | grep /man/man | wc -l15:08
_abc_for extra fun15:08
yetithat package only has some doc files and nothing else15:09
yetino binaries15:09
yetino man15:09
_abc_disregard, wrong syntax. Herding cats vs using debian package tools is easy.15:09
yetiDepends: imagemagick-6.q16 (>= 8:6.9.2.10+dfsg-2~)15:10
yeti This is a dummy package.  You can safely purge or remove it.15:10
yetiok... relicts15:10
_abc_How does one install an out of tree deb package without breaking everything? Specifically xclip?15:14
_abc_https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/145131/copy-image-from-clipboard-to-file references15:14
yetirecompile the deb-sources locally15:15
yetiif that succeeds, it'd be the best way to get it15:15
yetixclip -> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libx11-6, libxmu615:16
yetilooks harmless15:16
_abc_brb15:16
yetimaybe just try    sudo dpkg -i ...15:16
yetiI prefer compiling foreign deb-srcs against the local libs and only if that fails I declare using foreign debs as plan-b15:18
yetie.g. rasbbian9's gcc-4.6 debsrc doesnt build on raspbian10 any more... and I needed it... :-( but impoeting foreign binaries hrts...15:19
james1138https://pkgs.org/download/xclip15:44
james1138https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=xclip15:45
nemohm15:51
nemodevuan 2.0 is not detecting my discs on this new dell15:51
nemoany ideas?15:51
nemoguess I'll start by poking around in bios settings15:52
nemoefi seems to be detected in dmesg15:52
nemoer wait. that must be on the flash drive surely 😃15:52
buZznemo: you dont see them in dmesg?16:11
buZzthat would be odd16:11
buZzor you mean you dont see them in the installer?16:11
nemoI noticed some secure boot thingy was on. turned that off and rebooted16:11
nemowill see16:11
buZz\o16:11
_abc_fwiw yeti man convert -> convert (1) convert-im6 (1) convert-im6.q16 (1)16:12
_abc_Why do I have three imagemagick packages installed on the system?! This is ascii.16:12
nemocrud16:12
nemothat didn ot fix it16:12
nemo*did not16:12
nemofor "Partition disks" I have the 8GB USB with one line of white above and below it which I think is just for formatting16:13
buZzweird16:13
nemoin settings the SATA was set to RAID but changing it to ACPI gave a big warning about breaking OS - and I wanted to at least *try* to ensure windows still booted in its shrunken partition if needed for any return16:14
nemoso I left that alone16:14
buZznemo: oh thats quite plausible, yeah16:15
buZzto be the cause of not seeing your disks as disks16:15
Wonkaswitches like that often actually "hide" the AHCI controller by switching to a different PCI device type.16:19
Wonkaso that the generic windows driver doesn't match anymore and the specific "RAID" one is the only matching one16:20
Wonkadespite it working the same way, only doing software RAID additionally16:21
nemohm. well... I guess I'll change it at least just to find out16:32
nemoI don't need to modify the discs yet16:32
nemoand it is surely reversible16:32
nemothe worrying thing about the warning was "require a reinstall" ☹16:33
nemohttps://www.dell.com/community/XPS/HELP-Install-Ubuntu-Dual-Boot-switch-RAID-On-to-AHCI/td-p/575291416:33
nemohah16:33
nemodell XPS same as me16:33
nemoand yes. exactly same problem16:33
nemodammit dell16:33
Wonkait's actually possible that Windows won't find the partitions on the not-RAID-anymore storage because of management information at the beginning of the storage which the other driver had worked around16:34
nemo☹16:45
nemoWonka: ah. I see.16:46
nemothe recommendation is to switch windows to AHCI *FIRST*16:46
nemohope I didn't eff up this machine16:46
nemowell. worst case I lost a windows I didn't care that much  about16:47
nemoyay. nothing was destroyed and the windows instructions worked fine16:58
nemonow on AHCI16:58
nemoI swear dell comes up with a new way to screw linux every year16:58
nemowhy does this machine need raid config16:58
nemoand why does it not work w/ linux16:58
_abc_dell is made by dell to work for dell (Michael) using dell users, programs, power (!) and data.17:04
_abc_Any attempt to use dell [r][tm] products outside a contract and/or in "unapproved" ways will be sabotaged.17:05
_abc_Also dells have the secret recovery partition (pre boot environment) set up such that if one wipes it the machine won't boot at all, for some laptops at least.17:06
nemo_abc_: I made the mistake of buying one dell myself (this one is obviously a work computer where they pay a premium for a bunch of dell stuff I just deleted)17:14
nemo_abc_: I bought it because I wanted to support their first ever linux program, about a decade ago17:14
nemo_abc_: so I basically paid a little extra for the hardware to have the convenience of not building it myself, and also trying to show dell people cared about linux. which clearly did not work17:15
nemoor at least there weren't enough of us17:15
nemo_abc_: anyway, few years later I need to upgrade. I pick out an AMD processor, and board, and PSU…17:15
nemoonly to discover after ordering all of it that dell has completely non-standard cases that don't fit any standard board size or PSU17:16
nemoso. I ended up installing all that in my case that I bought two decades ago17:16
nemowhich *does* have standard dimensions ☺17:16
_abc_indeed. I remote-work a bit on systems I set up years ago and I told them DO NOT BUY DELL HW. What did they buy? Dell HW, second hand. Second hand means off contract and needs new parts now and then. After about one year the cd drive needed for installs (remote) died. It took 3 weeks of ebay spelunking and 1-2 virgins sacrified to get a replacement. Which was exactly like any other CD drive excepting for17:19
_abc_two small details: 1) one rear corner was "indented" so it would not bump into the expertly placed bracket (non removable) in the case and b) non standard connector and cable.17:19
_abc_Later I had to do with a Dell radial fan, which had the 5 pin 4 wire connector, which is made to not work with any other 4 wire fan out there. Wires swapped and connector empty keying slot moved.17:20
_abc_One buys Dell ONLY on contract. Once the contract is dead, the equipment has a self destruct timer ticking. When it runs down, something is going to give and it will be crippled or dead.17:20
_abc_That being said, they do/did make solid servers. HW wise solid. Not consumer level crap, servers.17:21
_abc_I'd not be too surprized if they come up with proprietary screw threads designed to jam normal screws if such are used.17:23
_abc_The latter (screw and mechanical caliber) is well known from military things designed to not work with enemy captured stuff.17:51
nemo*sigh* nouveau is installed and loaded but I'm at 1024x768, so I guess I'm going to have to install the kernel tainting binary blob17:52
nemomaybe I'll drop by their IRC channel to see if that is, in fact, the case17:52
nemohmmm could be devuan that is old17:52
nemothat certainly happens17:52
nemohow's the beta of devuan coming along?17:54
nemois it safe to use on a regular basis?17:54
golinuxnemo: There is always lxrandr.17:55
golinuxnemo: That depends on you usecase17:55
golinuxI have Xfce working in a VM but I don't actually use it for everyday tasks.  Only for testing if a proposed update doesn't fubar things.17:56
tomkHello, i have problem with xfce4-terminal.It simply does not dispaly the output of w,who and users command.Any idea what is wrong?thanks19:11
gnarfacedoes it display the output of any commands?19:11
gnarfaceit would be weird for a terminal issue to cause problems with just those two commands19:12
gnarfacei have no idea what is going wrong but the first thing i would probably try is some other commands, or another terminal19:13
tomkgnarface:it works in Xterm and Uxterm though19:13
gnarfaceyep, pretty weird19:13
gnarfacethat's on ascii?19:13
tomkeverything is all right with other commands.Just the mentioned three commands does not work in xfce-terminal and mate -terminal.19:14
tomkgnarface:It worked at the begining after fresh install and after sudenly no19:15
gnarfacethat is really weird.  i haven't heard of this happening before.  and this is a completely stock ascii install?  no out-of-distro packages installed?19:15
gnarfaceif you just upgraded or installed something between now and when it last worked, that thing should be the primary suspect right now19:16
gnarfaceotherwise, i'd say file a bug report against xfce-terminal.  make sure you mention that it's just those commands, and they work in other terminals.19:17
tomkYes it is.I also tried to reset both terminals, it helped but only once i got proper output but after that nothing19:17
tomkgnarface: I did not upgrade just updated .Here is what i get when run w command > https://pastebin.com/QDFXXWNN19:19
gnarfacetomk: not even a custom kernel?19:25
tomkgnarface:No nothing though the system is fully encrypted, but i think it is not related19:26
gnarfacereally weird19:27
tomkgnarface: i also tried to remove terminal config in my home directory no effect19:27
gnarfacei'm sorry, i've got no advice other than to file a bug report though, and hang out here to see if anyone else comes by who has seen this, but this one is new to me.19:27
gnarfacewell19:28
gnarfacei guess i have one other piece of advice; if everything works fine with urxvt, just use that instead and don't sweat it.  the other terminals all suck anyway.19:28
gnarfacebut i know that's not gonna fix anything19:28
gnarfacesome effort to report the bug would be the responsible thing to do19:29
fsmithredsomeone was complaining about xfce4-terminal and w/who/users a couple weeks ago19:29
gnarfaceif you check Debian's bug tracker maybe it has already been reported and maybe a workaround has been included in the report or a response.  you could get lucky.19:29
tomkgnarface: thanks anyway, whats weird Devuan Devuan Jessie 1.0.0 Stabl19:30
fsmithredand I'm getting the problem in beowulf, but not in ascii19:30
gnarfacehmmm19:30
gnarfacetomk: any backports packages?19:30
tomkgnarface:Devuan 1.0 worked everything OK19:30
gnarfacenoted19:30
fsmithredcorrection: *sometimes* doesn't work19:33
tomkgnarface: Yes i tried to install mate-terminal from backports and also youtube-dl, but that was after i encountered this bug19:33
fsmithredat first, who and users didn't work for root19:34
fsmithredcouple minutes later, it's working19:34
gnarfacewhy just that one terminal?  that's so weird.  could it have something to do with the video driver or the compositor?19:34
tomkfsmithred: for me w, who and users simply don t display any output19:35
fsmithredthat's what I get sometimes with who and users. w seems to work every time.19:36
fsmithredtomk, does 'which who' show you /usr/bin/who?19:39
fsmithredor type wh and tab to see if it completes19:39
tomkfsmithred:yes,i get correct output19:40
fsmithredI don't see anything relevant on the xfce4-terminal debian bug page.19:53
fsmithredafk for a bit19:53
tomkfsmithred:yea, i also checked the bug page did not find anything relevant20:01
xinomilo~/.xsession-errors , w -V ?20:18
tomkxinomilo:w -V gives > w from procps-ng 3.3.1220:26
tomkOK guys i got to go.Thanks for trying to help, wish you good day.See you next time:)20:35
fsmithredyeah, and /usr/bin/w is a symlink to w.procps (/usr/bin/? I forget)21:26
eyalrozDoes anyone on the channel know their way around the TeXLive packages?23:05
eyalrozBecause after apt-get dist-upgrade'ing, I'm getting a weird error trying to compile a document which was fine before the dist-upgrade.23:06
gnarfaceeyalroz: did you use --no-install-recommends?23:08
james1138SOrry know next to nothing about TexLive23:09
gnarfacei recall noticing occasionally that some packages' build dependencies assume you installed recommends23:09
hightower3eyalroz, well at least one thematic one is #gentoo-tex23:09
gnarfacebut yea, my goal during upgrades is usually to prevent texlive from getting installed, not the other way around...23:09
eyalroz@gnarface: I did not...23:09
gnarfaceeyalroz: just as a sanity check, did you try "apt-get build-dep [package name]" ?23:09
eyalrozgnarface: no... I ran apt-get dist-upgrade23:10
gnarfaceeyalroz: try the build-dep thing now.  maybe something just got inelegantly renamed23:10
eyalrozfor which package?23:11
gnarfaceuh, the one you're trying to23:11
gnarfaceoh compile23:11
gnarfacesorry23:11
eyalrozI'm compiling a latex document :-P23:11
gnarfacei thought you were compiling a package, now i see you're talking about a document, yes.23:11
eyalrozSo I'm guessing the gentoo-tex referral is irrelevant?23:11
HumanGeekeyalroz, which error ?23:14
hightower3eyalroz, yes sorry23:14
eyalrozHumanGeek: ! LaTeX Error: Unknown float option `H'.23:15
HumanGeekno line ?23:15
eyalrozHumanGeek:23:15
eyalrozl.868 \begin{figure}[H]23:15
eyalrozand of course I have \usepackage{float} ...23:16
gnarfacegoogle says this happens when you forgot to load the "float" package.   i assume they're not talking about debian packages though23:16
HumanGeeki dont know really well all packages but maybe H change in new float package version23:16
HumanGeekor maybe the is some kind of cache23:16
eyalrozHumanGeek: It's quite unlikely that would have changed, but it's not technically impossible... I'll check23:17
hightower3eyalroz, but try asking in #latex23:17
eyalrozhightower3: I will.23:17
HumanGeekif i remember well some packages are not reinstall after a upgrade23:18
eyalrozHumanGeek: Package hasn't changed since 200123:18
HumanGeeki also have weird error few month back23:18
HumanGeekand i have to reinstall some latex package23:19
HumanGeek*s23:19
HumanGeeki know it s not the good solution but23:19
gnarfacenothing in the repos is coming up for me under texlive-float though23:19
gnarfaceand the only thing i see for ^float is: floatbg - slowly modify the color of the X root window23:20
gnarfacewhich i'm sure is not the right thing23:20
HumanGeekcan you share relevant part of your doc ?23:20
gnarfaceeyalroz: ^?23:20
gnarfacewait, isn't it this? l.868 \begin{figure}[H]23:20
HumanGeekgnarface, it is23:21
eyalrozgnarface: That was the line which  triggers the error, yes23:21
eyalrozIt's an "innocent" line, it doesn't tell you much.23:21
gnarfaceeyalroz: what did you dist-upgrade to?  beowulf?  i wonder if maybe there WAS a texlive-float and it's just not build for beowulf and ceres yet23:21
eyalrozgnarface: Yes, beowulf, sorry. I'm on beowulf.23:21
eyalrozand was on it before.23:21
gnarfaceoh so it did used to work in beowulf?23:22
eyalrozgnarface: Yes.23:22
eyalrozUntil last week.23:22
gnarfaceso the dist-upgrade in question was a beowulf->beowulf dist-upgrade, to be clear?23:22
eyalrozgnarface: Yes. Sorry for not being clearer about that earlier ...23:23
gnarfaceno it's fine23:23
gnarfacei'm just trying to form a clear mental picture of what could have happened23:23
eyalrozSure, thanks.23:23
gnarfacei wonder if your /var/log/apt/history.log* files still have a record of any removed packages during that upgrade?23:23
gnarfaceyou might find the smoking gun in there23:24
eyalrozDuring that dist-upgrade, I had mostly install's and upgrade's, and the removes were:23:24
eyalrozcinnamon-screensaver-x-plugin:amd6423:24
eyalroz... oh! ... Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)23:24
gnarfaceah ha! evidence!23:25
eyalrozmaybe I need to dpkg-reconfigure some stuff23:25
gnarfaceyea, i think you just found a package bug23:25
gnarfaceor something interrupted your upgrade23:25
gnarfacereconfiguring or reinstalling the package(s) that choked very well might fix it23:25
eyalrozI vaguely remember something happening during the dist-upgrade, but I don't remember what, because right after that I think I re-issued the same command, or just apt-get install'ed with nothing or whatever.23:26
gnarfacewell you can check the output of "dpkg -l" and be suspicious of any lines that don't start with "ii" or "rc"23:27
eyalrozgnarface: All packages are either ii or rc.23:28
gnarfacedoh23:29
eyalrozgnarface: Running dpkg-reconfigure texlive-base now, maybe it'll help.23:29
gnarfaceall the packages being in "ii" or "rc" status doesn't prove there's no package bug, it just makes it harder to figure out for sure23:29
gnarfacei was hoping we'd get lucky and see one clearly marked as some partial or borked status23:30
gnarfaceeyalroz: let us know if you find it23:56
eyalrozgnarface: I will; turning in now. Thanks.23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!