libera/#devuan/ Friday, 2024-03-08

sfoxyeah, this works.00:07
sfoxcpan> force install gtk2::TrayIcon and then edit the debian/control to remove the perl-gtk2 dependency then build the package and install it00:07
gnarfacesfox: ... good to know, you got it all running well on that neomagic video chip then?00:19
plasma41sfox: see snapshot.debian.org for old versions of packages00:30
gnarfacesfox: i'm still trying to rack my brain about why i didn't remember about that ~/.Xauthority cookie, but i may have been drunk last time i set that up... ssh makes everything easier01:14
gnarfaceXDMCP is completely new to me, never touched it, it seems weird that it would have any different performance though01:15
rwpI have not used it in some twenty years and then not really used it but XDMCP as I understand it was designed for thin client X-Terminals and if there is a fast LAN between client and server then the X performance was very good.  Designed for 100Mbps networks it performed quite well on current 1000Mbps networks.  It's really only a LAN utility because again it's from the days of no security by default.01:44
rustyaxedisplay resolutions got way bigger01:46
rwpThat's true.  Big then was 1280x1024, non-square though it was.01:49
rustyaxei hope xrdp/freedp someday get h.264 in the server; its the one thing that keeps bringing me back to NoMachine01:52
rwpI almost never have a need for remote graphics these days.  I simply use ssh and terminal tools everywhere.  But I am looking at this because new small lightweight desktops can push 4x 4K displays for less than US$100 now with decent amount of RAM but almost no available storage.  So, could I XDMCP a thin client X terminal machine with 4x displays?  I have been considering it.01:54
rwpgotta run irl bbiab01:54
gnarfaceprice:performance nothing beats a Steam Link when they're on sale for $5 (and yes, they do h.264)01:55
gnarfaceyikes, just had a bad Xorg crash based on... stale /dev/input/ entries or something? never seen this error before01:58
gnarface[2666922.965] (EE) client bug: Invalid path /dev/input/event2701:58
gnarface[2666922.965] [dix] couldn't enable device 2101:58
gnarfacenot sure if it's related, but there were a few of those before it just dumped me to a console right now01:59
gnarface[2666924.376] (EE) [libseat/backend/seatd.c:122] Could not flush connection: Broken pipe01:59
gnarfacealso this01:59
gnarfaceanyone seen that happen? suspect stale /dev/input entries i need to manually delete from back when i was using unstable udev....01:59
gnarfacebrb01:59
gnarfacewell, that was a pretty weird Xorg crash, but there were xorg updates pending so i guess we'll see if that fixed it...02:18
rwpSounds like a random glitch, a cosmic ray from space, a gremlin, a poltergheist, or something transient.02:50
gnarfacemost likely it was something thunderbird did that enlightenment didn't like, but as frequently as such things seem to happen i am no closer to isolating the cause02:52
onefangSomething that gnarface doesn't understand???  I blame aliens.02:53
gnarfacehehe02:53
gnarfaceyou're probably right, it was probably aliens02:53
sfoxgnarface, still having issues with the neomagic computer. I think it's due to some sort of abi incompatibility05:14
sfoxi got it working an a amd64 laptop though05:14
sfoxgnarface, XDMCP handles all the Xcookies and xauthority05:14
sfoxrwp as long as your Xserver supports the Xinecara extension I don't see why not. Xinecara is the Xtension that implements multihead.05:16
sfoxYou could also run different Xservers for every display05:16
gnarfacesfox: believable that if it's got too old of a Xorg version (or Xfree86 even) that might cause a compatibility issue05:27
gnarfaceyou could always try the ffmpeg pipe thing05:27
gnarfacethe build in daedalus currently still says it supports XV05:29
gnarfacei'm reasonably confident i could help with the command-line though i don't think have any comparable hardware around here to test with... not assembled anyway05:30
rwpsfox, I am running multi displays now with two but that's the limit of my current graphics adaptor.  I was looking at a used HPt740 for example which had 4x DisplayPort outputs.  But this is all OT for here.05:42
sfoxnot sure what netbsd 9.3 is using but NetBSD was the only OS that would install with a working Xserver on i386 real hardware not just a virtual machine05:58
sfoxFreeBSD installs, but the Xserver won't work05:58
sfoxLinux ... doesn't want to work05:58
rwpOn a VM?  What graphics emulator are you using?  What's the errors in the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file?06:00
onefangLinux runs fine on real 486 hardware at least.  I have some that belongs to a client.  Haven't tried Devuan on it though.06:11
sfox*runs06:20
sfoxa lot of real i386 hardware getting modern operating systems on them is a lot harder then one would think06:21
sfoxfor example, on the i386 laptop freebsd segfaults if a pcmia card is installed while acpi is enabled.06:21
sfoxi mean panics06:21
sfoxmost Linux installers won't even run at all on such limited hardware06:22
avbox24I try to update from devuan 4 to 5, I always get libpam-modules error during dist-upgrade. Then it says debconf-2.0 would not be configured, but I don't find debconf-2.0, only 1.5.x. What to do?15:23
gnarfacenot sure exactly, but it's possible if you mixed repos or used backports that could happen15:24
gnarfaceusually you have to remove some stuff then re-add the right ones15:24
gnarfaceaptitude is usually more helpful here than apt/apt-get/apt-cache15:24
gnarfaceare you sure the sources.list is complete?15:25
gnarfaceanother thing that might happen is if there were security updates for example but you were missing that line15:25
avbox24gnarface: Thank you. Ok, from devuan 4 I had backports line, so I remove it, and I restart with old devuan 4 instance (it is all in an virtualized file).15:30
avbox24Unfortunatelly, I did not help, I nevertheless get libpam0g error during dist-upgrade. It says libpam0g depends on debconf and that debconf would not be configured and debconf-2.0 would not be installed.15:50
gnarfacetry aptitude?15:51
gnarfaceit will suggest specific solutions15:51
gnarfaceit doesn't look like debconf-2.0 even exists, so that's suspect: https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/policy-query.html?c=package&q=debconf&x=submit15:53
avbox24debconf-2.0 should be a "meta" package as you can choose from debconf and cdebconf15:54
fsmithredgnarface, if you search for debconf* then debconf-2.0 shows up, but it's not listed as being in any suites15:55
gnarfaceah, i see15:55
fsmithredmaybe install debconf=<version>\15:58
fsmithreddebconf=1.5.82 for daedalus15:59
avbox24When I install it with dpkg -i debconf_1.5.82_all.deb I stell get the error16:02
fsmithredaptitude safe-upgrade maybe?16:09
fsmithredand then if that works, dist-upgrade16:09
avbox24fsmithred: Ok, I will start again (needs some minutes)16:10
fsmithredAnother possibility is the nuclear option: remove libpam0g. In my case, that would take openssh-server with it.16:19
fsmithredand then add it in after the upgrade. But I really don't understand why you're having this problem. It's not one that I've heard about.16:20
avbox24safe-upgrade did not report any issues, so I again start apt dist-upgrade.16:26
avbox24So, I still have this nasty thing, I see that it starts with: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/overload.pm line 5, after it I get a lot of: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/overload.pm line 5.16:39
avbox24Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm line 346.16:39
avbox24BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm line 346.16:39
OwlWizardhi17:23
avbox24I don't still have a solution for upgrade from devuan 4 to 5? It looks like the perl installation is broken and so debconf. Any ideas?18:50
ted-iousavbox24: Did aptitude safe-upgrade fix anything?18:57
rwpavbox24, I wasn't following what you have written before but let me recommend that I wrote up a long article on how *I* do upgrades.  https://www.proulx.com/~bob/doc/bobs-guide-to-system-upgrades-with-debian/bobs-guide-to-system-upgrades-with-debian.html18:57
rwpMaybe something in there will connect the dots and help with your upgrade problems?18:58
avbox24No aptitude safe-upgrade did not fix anythin, but it reported too no errors18:58
avbox24rwp: Thank you, sounds a good information, I will go through it.19:00
rwpI have been able to upgrade from 4 to 5 with problems only on the XFCE packages, which are buggy, but they do work anyway, not a showstopper, just very annoying.  I now purge xfce entirely before the upgrade and then install it again afterwards, but it still has bugs surrounding /etc/xfce* conffiles intermingled with alternatives even on a pristine install.19:01
rwpI haven't written up anything about the problems I have with xfce conffiles and alternatives symlinks because it confuses me too but they have intermingled them and that just makes for a confusing mess of alternatives now named .dpkg-new and such that should not be happening.19:02
rwpThings still work regardless though and so it's not a showstopper.  It's just a mess.  It's an example where things can be a mess, but continue to work, and so things don't actually get fixed, until someone decides to work through the problems and give it some attention.19:03
rwpLook at the time!  I have to run off.19:03
avbox24I think it is a confict of the old perl 5.32 and 5.36. Installing debconf with dpkg -i debconf... does tell me that libperl5.32:amd64 is not available, but after installing 5.36 it should not complain about anythin in 5.32.19:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!